Capital Punishment Annotated Bib

Chinmaya Sharma Field LNG 406 25 January 2011 Capital penalty Just An An nonated Bibliography Capote, Tru homophile. In Cold Blood A True Account of A bigeminal Murder and Its Consequences. New York Vintage, 1994. Print. Crowe, Robert E. Should Capital Punishment be Retained? Pro. congressional Digest Aug. 1927 228+. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 26 Jan. 2011. Crowe conceptualises the primary benefit of uppercase penalisation is its usefulness in deterring any future criminal acts, curiously murders. He asserts the last penalty is the only penalty equal in value to the murders or other(a) abhorrences for which capital penalization is sentenced.While attack the United States government for its miss of criminal regulation, Crowe suggests capital penalty forget instill fear in criminals and make them regard twice ahead committing a violent crime. He states this fear of punishment is what protects citizens from the wrath of untamed murderers who, without the de cease penalty, would believe they have nothing to fear. Crowe proclaims someone who tries to nullify the death penalty in court is hampering the progress of the American government and is holding the rest of corporation in danger.As the obligate continues, Crowe concurs that the feeling of universe on the jury of a murder trial is one of the nigh difficult as you hold the support of a person in your hands. However, he believes plurality have the best interest of their society in mind. Crowe uses Chicago as an example of how capital punishment as resulted in the decrease in murders and other crimes. through with(predicate)out the rest of the phrase, Crowe discusses how the life of the victim is forever lost and the punishment should be proportionate to the rime, how even those who atomic number 18 deemed irresponsible should be sentenced to the death penalty for the better of society, and how there is proofread of capital punishment deterring further crime. Crowes summa ry of capital punishment and its justification is thorough, but only thorough in one aspect. The cause focuses only on the deterring effect the death penalty has on crime and other murderers. His learning is likely, but seems to be more focused on appealing to the emotions rather than stating blatant points. The pedigree of this article is a congressional magazine.Therefore, staying within the limits of the slight bias, the in lay downation is coming from a credible pedigree and should be valuable for my research and debate.. Due to the article dating linchpin to the 1920s, the statistics and facts of this article may not be accurate. While some of my other research has focused on addressing counter- causes, this article solidifies one strong point. Crowes argument revolves around the deterring effect of capital punishment on murders. Therefore, this article ordain provide a basis for my analysis of the societal results of the death penalty.I forget as well as use the stat ements made by Crowe virtu tout ensembley how it is the moral duty of the justice system to protect and provide for the citizens for the country. By leaving these murders and criminals alive, he believes we argon putting the rest of society at risk. This article provide grow to be invaluable when addressing some of the issues such(prenominal) as societal safety and the overall effects of capital punishment on future criminal acts. Franklin, H. Bruce. Billy Budd and Capital Punishment. American Literature. Web. 02 Feb. 2011. . floor Early World and American Death Penalty Laws. Death Penalty. Web. 02 Feb. 2011. . Johnson, Robert, and Sandra metal courseer. sustenance Without Parole, Americas Other Death Penalty. The Prison Journal. Sage Publications. Web. 30 Jan. 2011. . Life without give-and-take is examined as a version of death penalty. The informants contain how life without parole is a true life punishment because the prisoners essential live their lives knowing that they result never be allowed out. The two discourse more of the prisoners and prison officers to understand the agents, both mentally and physically, of the prisons in which these criminals stay.Smith and Johnson indicate the conditions of the prisons are ideal because they include food, a bed, recreation and galore(postnominal) other commodities. The true impact comes from the emotional turmoil from knowing that the prison is where they impart die. While many assume the life without parole prisoners must(prenominal) be a threat to society within and outside of the prison, the authors prove the emotional impact changes the criminals and makes them more respectable wad The article also evinces how these people feel so lonely and that is why life without parole is a viable alternative for the death penalty.Overall, this mention will plausibly be the least used source out of my entire bibliography. I chose this source when I knew that my part of the argument would be to th e highest degree the conditions of prisons. However, the article does satisfy the part of my argument that shows how the prisons of these criminals are actually in completed condition and how the prisoners enjoy the conditions while living there. Robert Johnson and Sandra Smith both work at large universties and are publishing a significant article. Therefore, I believe this article is reliable and the information should be credible.The goal of the source is to show how life without parole is not as good as everyone believes it is. The source is objective because it shows both good and bad aspects of prison. I will use this source to help prove my point about the condition of the prisons. Johnson and Smith both indicate how the conditions are fantastic with food and recreation. These conditions are better than many of the conditions of people living in America. I will also utilize the first-hand account of one of the prisoners to back up my argument.It will fit perfectly into the b ody of my argument by shaping how I explain how tax-payers money is furnishing a lavish living style of these criminals compared to what they were in before. Hopefully, this evidence will help convince people that the minor monetary value difference that may occur at times between life without parole and capital punishment is miniscule when considering the broader aspect. sharp, Dudley. Death Penalty Paper. Pro-death Penalty. Web. 30 Jan. 2011. . Sharps article assesses every aspect of the capital punishment argument.He starts by indicating how the anti-death penalty movement has overwhelmed the debate and has filled peoples minds with lies which have no self-colored evidence. He states how capital punishment is the only punishment which fits the amplitude of the crime. When addressing the risk of a innocent man be executed, he explains how the statistics given by roughly people are incorrect. In the United States, there have only been a nice amount of cases where an innocent m an was executed. Sharp illustrates the lack of mistakes involving the death penalty.Sharp continues to summarize how the death penalty is a deterrent to crime and how this fact is conclusive and irrefutable. He also states how capital punishment makes American society a safer place to live. Throughout the rest of the article, Sharp talks about a variety of topics including race and the death penalty, cost of capital punishment versus life without parole, death penalty procedures and the relation between Christianity and capital punishment. Sharps analysis of every argument makes this article absolutely perfect for the debate funding capital punishment.For every point he makes, he provides a pick and occasionally a justification if numbers should be altered. Since this site is earlier about supporting capital punishment, a small bias by chance evident in his writing. He seems to be a credible source because he works as the Death Penalty Resources Director at Justice For All. I th ink his article could be used for a variety of purposes because he encompasses all of the major points supporting capital punishment. He frequently takes information from the Death Penalty Information Center, reinforcing his credibility.I think this article will be valuable to be because of the statistics and information it uses to show how capital punishment is actually cheaper then life without parole. Unlike most of the other sites I have looked at, it actually provides calculations footfall by step and justification if certain numbers are only estimates and how these estimates were made. Sharp does not leave any part of the argument with a weak end. Since my argument is the cost between death penalty and life without parole, this article will almost suffice as all I need.I believe it will be very difficult to refute evidence which is so precise such as the information Sharp has provided. This article will help show that the death penalty is cheaper than life without parole. Sta nton, Edward C. Should Capital Punishment be Retained? Pro. Congressional Digest Aug. 1927 232+. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 25 Jan. 2011. Stantons article assesses each specific argument made by people supporting the abolishment of capital punishment and provides a dianoetic and complete rebuttal.After reviewing past articles and statements made by these abolitionists, Stanton states that most of these people are sentimentalists who have completely battered the minds of readers into a state of submission. Through the use of two court cases in the past few geezerhood in which murderers were given a lighter sentence than they deserved, the author reiterates sentimentalists persuade and destroy the backbone of juries. Furthermore, Stanton provides statistics demonstrating the increase of homicides in the United States.Stanton declares most of the sentimentalists lack experience dealing directly with murders which makes their statements difficult to believe. Throughout th e rest of the article, the author indicates several of the arguments these sentimentalists put frontwards and counters with his own support of capital punishment. Stanton includes counter-arguments against all of the following choosing life-imprisonment over capital punishment, giving opportunities to the criminals, capital punishment being a practice of the past, and the chance of having an innocent person convicted and executed.Stanton provides a substantial and thorough analysis of why capital punishment should be retained as a policy in the United States. His information seems credible as he uses several statistics and court cases to reinforce his statements. Stanton may be slightly biased because he has dealt with murders in the past, but this also contributes to his authenticity. The information is quite reliable as it comes from a congressional magazine. This article in the main focuses on telling the complete truth about capital punishment and convincing people capital pu nishment is a just form of punishment.Stanton tries to eliminate the flowery and false information sentimentalists provide for readers. The only negatively charged aspect of this article is it dates back to the 1920s. Therefore, the statistics cannot be used for present-day. Stantons article on capital punishment satisfies one of the requirements for my debate. He provides an answer for many of the points the other team may use. The article shapes how I will salvage my rebuttal by providing information which would counter most of the arguments put forth by those arguing capital punishment as an unjust form of punishment.Stanton solidifies my view that capital punishment deters criminals from committing the worst crimes because they fear the death penalty. He also addresses the fear of executing people are innocent of a crime. Since the chance of a false conviction is so small, any dubiousness that the death penalty is a proper form of punishment for those criminals with unforgive able crimes should be forgotten. Stantons views coincide with my own and provide a solid lowly for a rebuttal in the debate.