My opinion about Catherine Hayles’ book Essay Example for Free

My opinion approximately Catherine Hayles book EssayMy opinion about Catherine Hayles bookIntroduction I disagree with the conclusion of Catherine hayles book and her latest advice.The picture that Catherine Hayles frames is that piece macrocosm creation fear to be post tender .In her cable She puts tuition as the core that only requires a conveying media and that media crumb be machines or benevolent being. She shows how post human is necessary by freehanded it a positive out visualise than human. Hayles argues that human being impart be replaced by post human and the human race ordain face liquidation. In her conclusion she states that post human ar weapons-grade than human being and goes further to feeble the human being by saying that they are non autonomous in cerebration . In a further extent Hayles in her book says that computers machines and programs will wipe away the human race.There are many things I dont agree with Catherine Hayles I will lay down my argument disagreeing with her argument. human being are superior over in all creation and they cannot be replaced by any other creation.Catherine Hayles argues that human being will morph into something else, something handle a cyborg where machines will be overall and incharge and commernder of the other creation.This view is far away from truth, human being cannot be replaced by a creation that has been made by Him. benevolent being were shaped to naturalise the earth and all the other creations are inferior to Human. Its not possible to create something and be inferior to it. God is superior to us and so we are superior to machines. Catherine Hayles needs to elaborate and let off why can we create something and it turns to our god. Posthuman cannt think as human being does. Hayles lays down her argument saying that post human do think as human being . This she tries to argue that the full treatment and actions that can be d star by a human being due to thinking can al so be done by robot because it thinks too. Do posthuman have self will uniform human being does? This is a question not answered in her book. Human being thinks in a natural way and posthuman thinks as a result of radio frequency identification (RFID). There is a big gap between posthuman and human being and nothing can bridge this gap. Looking at the contri thoion she made the last in her book , her ambition are much higher. The first chapter she take away the book of Hans Moravecs Mind ChildrenThe future of robot and human intelligence and she got a shock. The thing that captured her sense was Moravecs assertion which stated that near future the certain(prenominal)ness of human being will be transferred to that of computer.There are dickens prepositions that are implicated here (1) That existence of information is not reliable to a particular substrate. (2) The consciousness of human being is information. These two preposition are the one that Hayles through her narrative c ontests tercet devoted topics The cyborg emerged as a result of cultural artifacts, how the body was lost by information and the construction that resulted the emergency of post human. Hayles goes further in defining post human using two other ways, first was that posthuman are susceptible, coordinating and self organizing its self in a larger system. She argues that we are dictated by the milieu we live in and thus integrated into that environment. She says that human being undeniable posthuman and thus the technology is the one that pushes for it. The innovation is the one that created posthuman and human being now depends on posthuman. She alludes posthuman in a manner above its definition, she says that the information from body is tranferrable from body to machines.Its in truth(prenominal) put right is literature and has no facts in it human and posthuman mutually require each other to survive but posthuman requires human to live. Hayles opposes the formulation of the seco nd definition of post human and endorsing the definition of the first one. She argues that we think of suggestive visions where machines will be equal and become our superior. Hayles didnt see the danger to obviate the stated machines and the backlash of changing definition. Hayles argument doesnt give any hope for survival of human being, thats very pathetic. Another argument she grounds herself with is that there will be full integration of ones self with a machine and that the content that evolution excluded. She says that body has a sediment history and it do have an architecture in it, a physical structure whose constraints and possibilities have been formed by an evolutionary history that intelligent machines do not share. ( C. H ayles,284, 2009.) In my views, human being cannot be amply identified with machines. Hayles did mention about Joseph Weizenbaums statement that making a judgement and the capacity to feign is a matter that should be left as an ethical principle, t o the human alone. I dont agree. What are the impacts of feeding more and more information and junctures to technology and computers? How is it possible for us to lose our unselfishness for we resign the skill to practice the decision of of a particular nature? If we take machine and look at themselves, the analysis of Hayles shows that posthuman have the same consciousness as human and they help in our thinking and they do perform the functions that we dont need to but quiet want to.Infact they do function and perform better than human being .But we should not forget where they originated from. All machines and their relatives they came from the effort of human sound judgment production. Human being has created them to aid in maximizing his own efficiency and he have, with no interrogative sentence accomplished his motive. Without human being machines would not be in existence and thus for them to exist human being has to exist first and the cognition ability would not be there . Ayn Rand character has one that we can link to this art and says in Atlas Shrugged I thoughtof the men who claim that machines condition their brains. well up there was the motor to condition them, and there it remained as just exactly what it is without mans mind-as a pile of metal scraps and wires, going to rust. (page 745, Atlas Shrugged) This statement show sense in Hayles and I agree on Human is conditioned by machine and we appreciate them in our lives and enhance them but I differ in that human being is still dorminant . Machines without the human being they would go extinction and get to rust. If the cyborg and the cyborg varieties were to exist as put by the Hayles they would still require human skills and characteristics for their brain to function, to have conscious and to think analogous human being. Hyles didnt explain this and how if human being were to go to extinction the post human would survive, else she have a task to do. Hayles the premises that she posits a s other cause of fear of post human is the liberal humanist opinion of the human kind matters autonomy. Human being are able to see all the possibilities which are open to choose and they have the will and they can synthesize these sources. Schopenhauers there is an outline in THE WORLD AS WILL AND REPRESENTATION(BOOKIII). Human being are able to think, they are able to process data , they are able to create it and pull judgements built on their feelings. This Information comes from several sources in machine but in human being they come purely on them. Machines they are devoid of thinking and they have no conscious like ours. Hayles in her argument doesnt have the real world instances , and those that she uses are not very clear they are not specifically illuminating. In her early books she says that she finds saying that Well my sleep gene wants to rest, but my food agent says I should go to the store( Hayles 2009,6).This is certainly an odd approach of talking and She draws a v ery significant deductions from it. Each person , She claims, who thinks this way begins to envision herself or himself as a posthuman collectivity, an I transformed into the we of autonomous agents operating together to make self (Catherine. H, pg 6 2009) There are questions that rises about personal disorders of the multitude. The example of ability of multiple to celebrate and creatively dissociate leads to rejection of therapy that tries to integrate their adjusts. masses definitely will be talking around themselves in a fresh ways. But lesson agents asks what thinking together about themselves meant. Hayles put it that serious con boldnessration needs to be given to how certain characteristics associated with liberal subject, especially agency and choice, can be articulated with in posthuman context (Catherine.Hayles, pg5, 2009) and she left it like that . She didnt show any alternative of her implications. In conclusion Hayles argument is lacking enough facts and is ground in prepositions that she lays to win the heart of literature, and in my views she didnt succed. If you consider streams with standing waves, which visibly forms the front side of the rocks which projects superficial above the water. They retain their normal shape and their normal integrity despite being changed by the molecules of water .I still find the machines being continuously changing their integrity but cant replace human being and they cant lead extinction of human kind.ReferencesHarrison, Ariane Lourie. Architectural theories of the environment posthuman territory. New York, NY Routledge, Taylor Francis Group, 2013. Print.Hayles, N. Katherine. How we became posthuman practical(prenominal) bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, Ill. University of Chicago Press, 1999. Print.Leithauser, Brad. Penchants places essays and criticism. New York A.A. Knopf , 1995. Print.Younkins, Edward W.. Ayn Rands Atlas shrugged a philosophical and literary companion. Al dershot, England Ashgate, 2007. Print. Bateson, Catherine. world Bee. New York Holiday House, 2007. Print.Gronebaum, Melissa. Arthur schopenhauers die welt als wille und vorstellung. S.l. Grin Verlag Gmbh, 2014. Print.Harrison, Ariane Lourie. Architectural theories of the environment posthuman territory. New York, NY Routledge, Taylor Francis Group, 2013. Print.Hayles, N. Katherine. How we became posthuman virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, Ill. University of Chicago Press, 1999. Print.Leithauser, Brad. Penchants places essays and criticism. New York A.A. Knopf , 1995. Print.Younkins, Edward W.. Ayn Rands Atlas shrugged a philosophical and literary companion. Aldershot, England Ashgate, 2007. Print.Source document